Eric Grannon
Chambers-ranked Antitrust partner with a challenger mindset, who started at White & Case LLP as a summer associate
- Role
- Partner at White & Case LLP
- Location
- Washington, WA, US
- LinkedIn followers
- 500 followers
About Eric Grannon
Eric Grannon has helped companies eliminate billions of dollars in potential liability by repeatedly winning dismissals under Rule 12, defeating class certification under Rule 23, and winning summary judgment under Rule 56 (all as lead counsel). Eric also has secured a verdict for defendants in an antitrust jury trial.\"Eric is knowledgeable and easy to work with.\" Chambers USA Antitrust (2024)Antitrust Attorney of the Year - LMG Life Sciences (2024)Two-time Law360 MVP: Class Actions (2022), Antitrust (2012)Defeated class certification in 2022 (securities) and 2018 (antitrust)Lead counsel obtaining HSR clearance at the FTC and DOJCounseled more than forty settlements of pharmaceutical patent litigation that have avoided challenge by the FTC and class-action barCounsel of record in U.S. Supreme Court for two pharmaceutical company respondents in FTC v. Actavis, 570 U.S. 13•••13) Eric has worked on twelve matters before the U.S. Supreme Court, ten of which were antitrust cases.Former Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division at DOJManaged FCPA compliance and investigations at White & Case since 2001Recent examples of Eric\'s success on behalf of clients include:Am Law named Eric and his team runner-up Litigators of the Week for winning In re Bystolic Antitrust Litig, 101 F.4th 223 (2d Cir. 2024)(affirming dismissal with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6) of “pay for delay” antitrust allegations against six settlements of pharmaceutical patent litigation with alleged “side deals”). Eric successfully argued the dismissals on behalf of all defendants in the S.D.N.Y. and before the Second Circuit.Lead counsel successfully arguing the motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 leading to the dismissal with prejudice of the action brought by the Robbins Geller firm under Exchange Act claims seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages based on alleged purchases of unsponsored ADRs and common stock issued in Japan. Stoyas v. Toshiba Corp, No. 15-4194,(C.D. Cal. May.
Experience
Partner
Jan 1997 — Present
Education
Howard University
Juris Doctor (J.D.), Law
1995 — 1998
Brooklyn College
Bachelor's Degree
1995
Find verified contacts for anyone on LinkedIn
Unifers gives sales teams verified emails and direct dials, enriched profiles, and outreach that lands in the inbox.
Free plan included · No credit card required
This profile is compiled from publicly available professional sources. Unifers is not affiliated with or endorsed by LinkedIn. Request removal of this profile.