Daniel Prince

About Daniel Prince

Daniel Prince is a Partner in the Litigation Department of Paul Hastings. He works in the Firm’s Los Angeles and Palo Alto offices. Mr. Prince is Vice Chair of the Litigation Department in Los Angeles, where he also serves as Hiring Partner for the office. Mr. Prince represents clients in corporate and government investigations and complex litigation matters, including domestic and international arbitration, trials, and class actions. In addition to handling commercial disputes, Mr. Prince counsels clients on employee mobility and trade secrets issues, confidentiality provisions, dispute resolution clauses, and enhancements to compliance programs. A thought leader and former collegiate debater, Mr. Prince is a skilled advocate who develops innovative strategies for handling high-stakes engagements. This includes driving the use of eDiscovery and data science technology to generate cost-effective solutions for clients.*This material may be considered attorney advertising under certain rules of professional attorney conduct. No attorney-client relationship is created when you contact me.

Experience

1. Partner

   Paul Hastings

   Oct 2004 — Present · Los Angeles, CA, US

   Complete victory in a trial against the government involving the “worst corruption scandal in the history of the Navy.” All charges dismissed with prejudice after the jury reached no verdict against our client- Served as General Counsel of a client, responsible for supporting compliance & other functions, and managing risk for an entity with $1B in revenues and employees- Represented a multinational construction machinery company in an ICC arbitration involving a manufacturing joint venture- Led an internal investigation for a technology company into a whistleblower’s claims alleging the payment of bribes to a public official- Defending a multinational company in a putative class action alleging violations of the Equal Pay Act and other laws- Defended a publicly-traded restaurant chain in a nationwide criminal investigation into food safety & foodborne illness matters- Advised a streaming company on anti-corruption program implementation- Guided a Korean conglomerate towards a global resolution of civil and criminal trade secrets cases involving para-aramid fibers used in body armor and other applications, after a federal grand jury indictment, a 7-week civil trial, and appellate proceedings- Represented a public agency in a federal grand jury investigation into allegations of fraud arising out of a billion dollar procurement contract. No criminal charges were filed- Defended a medical device company in a federal probe relating to if its product’s specification was misleading. No criminal charges were filed- Secured the dismissal of a lawsuit against Central America’s largest independent beverage producer in a matter involving the NY Convention, the FAA, and state law- Obtained a decision in Toyo Tire Holdings of Am. Inc. v. Cont\'l Tire N. Am, Inc, 609 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2010), where an appellate court found that a federal district court has jurisdiction to issue interim relief pending constitution of an arbitral tribunal.

Education

• University of Southern California

  M.A., Communication Management

  2000 — 2002

• University of Southern California

  B.A., Broadcast Journalism and Communication

  1996 — 2000

• Loyola High School of Los Angeles

  Diploma

  1992 — 1996

• University of Chicago Law School

  J.D., Law

  2001 — 2004

Skills

• International Arbitration
• Intellectual Property
• Arbitration
• Civil Litigation
• Internal Investigations
• Commercial Litigation
• White Collar Criminal Defense
• Trade Secrets
• Corporate Law